PENGARUH PENGALAMAN KERJA, TINGKAT PENDIDIKAN DAN PELTIHAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT SEMEN BATURAJA (persero) Tbk DI DIVISI OPERATION
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and prove the effect of work experience, level of education and training on the performance of employees of PT Semen Baturaja (Persero) Tbk in the Operations Division, both partially and simultaneously. The population of this study is 286 employees of PT Semen Baturaja (Persero) Tbk in the Operations Division with a sample of 127 employees. The sampling technique used is Non-probability sampling with the type of sampling that is purposive sampling. The results showed that the t value of the work experience variable (4.204) > ttable (1.97944), the t-count value of the education level variable (4.218) > t table (1.97944), the t-count value of the training variable (6.067) > ttable (1 .9746) and calculated F value (65.117) > F table (2.68). The correlation coefficient (R) 0.783 shows a strong and positive relationship, the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.614 which means 61.4% of the employee performance variables of PT Semen Baturaja (Persero Tbk in the Operations Division can be explained by the variables of work experience, level of education and training and 38 ,6% is influenced by other variables.The conclusion of this study shows that the variables of work experience, level of education and training partially and significantly have a positive and significant influence on employee performance.
References
Abdullah,Ma’aruf.2014. ManajemenDanEvaluasiKinerjaKaryawan.editedbyB.R.Hakim. Yogyakarta:AswajaPressindo.Dessler, Gary, Nina Dawn Cole, and Nita Chhinzer. 2015. Management of Human Resources:TheEssentials. Pearson London.Follet,MaryParker.2007. Manajemen.Jakarta:Indeks.Handoko,T.Hani.2012.“ManajemenSumberDayaManusia,EdisiKedua.”Yogyakarta: BPEF.MalayuSPHasibuan.2016.ManajemenSumber DayaManusia.Revisi.Jakarta:PTBumiAksara.Mangkunegara,AnwarPrabu.2012.“EvaluasiKinerjaSDM,RefikaAditama.”Manullang,M.,andM.Marihot.2012.“ManajemenSumberDayaManusia II.”Jakarta:Erlangga.Martoyo, Susilo. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. 5th ed. Yogyakarta: BPFE.Pradiansyah, Arvan. 1999. Lima Prinsip Pembangunan Komitmen. Jakarata: Pustaka BinamanPressindo.Rivai, Veithzal. 2015.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan Dari Teori KePraktek.7th ed.Bandung: Rajagrafindo Perkasa.Siagian,S. 2001.TeoriMotivasi DanAplikasinya.Jakarata: RinekaCipta.Sikula,AndrewE.1981.PelatihanDanPengembanganTenagaKerja.Jakarata:PustakaBinaman.Simamora,Henry.2004.“ManajemenSumberDayaManusia.”Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.Sujarweni,Wiratna.2014.MetodePenelitian: Lengkap,Praktis,DanMudah Dipahami. Yogyakarta:PustakaBaruPress.Terry, George R. 2021. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Edisi Revisi. Bumi Aksara.Tirtaraharja, Umar. 2005. Pengantar Pendidikan. Revisi Cet. Jakarata: RinekaCipta.Trihendradi.2011.LangkahMudahMelakukan AnalisisStatistikMenggunakanSPSS 19. Yogyakarta: ANDIOffset.Usman,Husaini.2011.ManajemenTeori,Praktik,DanRisetPendidikan.3rded.Jakarata:PTBumiAksara.Wirawan, Dewa Gede Candra. 2016. “Pengaruh Pemahaman Akuntansi, Kompetensi SumberDayaManusia,PengalamanKerja,DanPeranInternalAuditTerhadapKualitasLaporanKeuanganPadaSKPDKabupaten Bangli.” Ekuitas:JurnalPendidikanEkonomi4(2).Trihendradi. 2011.Langkah Mudah Melakukan Analisis Statistik Menggunakan SPSS 19. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.Veronica Hitalessy dkk. 2021. Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Kepemimpinan dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada RRI Manokwari. Journal of Applied Managementand Business Research (JAMBiR). 1(2). Hal 162-172
Hermalinda, T., Afriansyah, B., & Meriana, M. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Kualitas SDM terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus Pada BUM Desa Di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong). Akuisisi: Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(2), 141-152. doi:https://doi.org/10.24127/akuisisi.v17i2.603
